Your daily dose of photovoltaic technology developments and solar news

• Popular Technical Papers

  • Overview of automation in the photovoltaic industry
  • Understanding moisture ingress and packaging requirements for photovoltaic modules
  • Evaluation of encapsulant materials for PV applications
  • Inline processing of crystalline silicon solar cells: the holy grail for large-scale manufacturing?
  • PV sector outlook: an analyst’s perspective

• Featured Technical Papers

  • Transparent conducting oxide deposition techniques for thin-film photovoltaics
  • Comprehensive and advanced quality assurance measures for optimal yields from PV power plants
  • Surface passivation of silicon solar cells using industrially relevant Al2O3 deposition techniques
  • Influence of a-Si:H deposition temperature on thermal stability of a-Si:H/SiNx:H stacks
  • Integrated loops: a prerequisite for sustainable and environmentally-friendly polysilicon production

In most complex manufacturing environments, equipment failures dominate.  These failures are commonly referred to as 'fires' because of the chaos and damage they inflict on factory operations. For example, a key piece of equipment fails, creating a blockage in the production line. One or more personnel are quickly dispatched to fix the problem. The situation is dire, threatening to slow daily product starts and slip output goals. Those working the problem know this failure is of the utmost importance and know if they can just get the machine at an acceptable level, the stress from management will be lifted. Logic leads these personnel to suspect a specific component, which is then replaced. This paper discusses the best method of ensuring that this 'patching' of problems does not become part of the regular maintenance routine.

Paper costs $15.00. It's FREE when you purchase a subscription.